Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Restructuring results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,302 hits . Analysis detected 13,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,036 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,521 of 15,447 topics). This Corporate Restructuring is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Corporate Restructuring
Topic details
Total words: 14,036
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst