Topic summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Prices results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 3,210 hits . Analysis detected 22,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,175 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,677 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Prices is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Consumer Prices
Topic details
Total words: 23,175
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst