Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Lerman results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.9% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 1,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 556 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of 99% (88 of 6,363 authors). This Rachel Lerman is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Rachel Lerman
Author details
Total words: 556
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.6% percentile 18.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles556 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 44.8% 44.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 45.1% 45.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 32.7% 32.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 47.1% 47.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 25.2% 25.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 48.9% 48.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 20.7% 20.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.8% 15.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 48.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 47.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 45.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 44.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 32.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 25.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 20.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst