Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis Melgar results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.5% saturation with 133 hits . Analysis detected 691 faulty-reasoning hits from 220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.9% and a BS Rank of 99% (64 of 6,628 authors). This Luis Melgar is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Luis Melgar
Author details
Total words: 220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.0% percentile 20.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles220 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 60.5% 60.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 32.7% 32.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.9% 30.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 43.6% 43.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 26.8% 26.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 21.8% 21.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 25.9% 25.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 15.9% 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 10.9% 10.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 60.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 43.6%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Author 32.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 26.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 25.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 15.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst