Topic summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Politics results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,859 hits . Analysis detected 24,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,937 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (12,048 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Politics is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Congressional Politics
Topic details
Total words: 23,937
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst