Calif. Rep. Kevin Kiley leaves GOP, becoming only Independent in the House0%

By Addie Davis0%

3/9/2026, 12:12:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 51.2% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 389 faulty-reasoning hits from 289 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley questions former Special Counsel Jack Smith as he testifies during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill on January 22, 2026 in Washington, DC. 
(Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images) 
California Rep. Kevin Kiley announced on Monday that he is officially leaving the Republican Party and switching his affiliation to Independent, making him the sole Independent in the U.S. House of Representatives. 
During virtual calls with reporters, Kiley (Calif.-03) confirmed he would submit the necessary paperwork to the House Clerk that day to formalize the change. 
He cited deep frustration with rising partisanship in Congress as a key reason for the shift. 
The move follows Kiley’s announcement last Friday that he had filed for reelection in the newly redrawn California’s 6th Congressional District as a “No Party Preference” candidate. 
He reportedly plans to continue caucusing with Republicans for the remainder of his current term to maintain committee assignments and administrative support, though the switch formally narrows the GOP’s already slim House majority. 
This enables him to continue to keep his positions on committees, if leadership allows, according to The Hill. 
“As an elected representative, I’ve always seen my role as being an independent voice for our community, holding politicians in Sacramento and Washington accountable,” he said, emphasizing his accountability to constituents rather than party leaders. 
“It is no secret I’ve been frustrated, at times disgusted, by the hyper-partisanship in Congress,” he continued, citing last year’s government shutdown, increase in healthcare costs, and “a pointless redistricting war." 
Regarding future legislation, he stated he intends to evaluate every bill on its own merits. 
CBS News highlighted that the lawmaker has a history of breaking party lines on specific issues. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Addie Davis: 4.4%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Addie Davis: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 45.3%Addie Davis: 9.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect45.3%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Addie Davis: 3.9%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 8.4%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 51.2%Addie Davis: 5.3%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias51.2%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 5.5%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Addie Davis: 3.1%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 10.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

289 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.