Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Independent Politicians results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 867 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,222 of 16,562 topics). This Independent Politicians is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Independent Politicians
Topic details
Total words: 867
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles867 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 38.2%38.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.0%45.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 4.6%4.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.0%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 38.2%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos