Townhall⁠84%

House Set to Pass SAVE America Act for Fourth Time, Johnson Says ⁠51%

By Scott McClallen⁠27%

6/28/2026, 9:00:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Nature, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 267 faulty-reasoning hits from 193 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (10,808 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the article peer group.

The U.S. 
House will pass the Save America Act for a fourth time, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson (LA-4) told Fox News on Sunday. 
The bill package aims to ensure that only citizens vote in federal elections by showing proof of citizenship when registering to vote and by showing a valid ID before voting. 
Johnson told Fox News that Republicans will try to place the package in a reconciliation bill to avoid the required 60 votes in the Senate. 
"I told the President, I don't have any tattoos, but if I did, it'd say 'SAVE AMERICA' on my shoulder. 
Okay, we passed it three times in the House already. 
We're going to pass it AGAIN." 
Johnson said that these are “90-10” public issues. 
If the House passes the bill, it will be sent to the Senate, where Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) hasn’t been able to get enough votes to pass. 
Earlier in June, four Senate Republicans – Sens. 
Thom Tillis (R-NC), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Susan Collins (R-ME) – joined Democrats to vote against the bill. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.1%Scott McClallen: 2.4%Townhall: 5.3%Confirmation Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 2.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.1%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.3%Townhall: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Scott McClallen: 7.7%Townhall: 11.2%Framing Effect15.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect5.2%This article: 11.4%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Optimism Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 25.9%Scott McClallen: 8.5%Townhall: 13.5%Negativity Bias25.9%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.9%Townhall: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.8%Townhall: 4.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.9%Townhall: 3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.4%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.3%Recency Bias15.0%This article: 10.4%Scott McClallen: 0.3%Townhall: 0.6%Primacy Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.5%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 2.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 4.2%Townhall: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.5%Townhall: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.3%Townhall: 9.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.4%Scott McClallen: 10.3%Townhall: 11.1%Appeal to Emotion10.4%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.1%Townhall: 2.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.4%Townhall: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 15.5%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature15.5%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.2%Scott McClallen: 0.2%Townhall: 1.4%Anecdotal5.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 1.7%Townhall: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.0%Townhall: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 2.0%Townhall: 3.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.4%Scott McClallen: 3.2%Townhall: 3.0%Quote-first Misdirection10.4%This article: 6.2%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 16.1%Biased Writer Voice6.2%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 4.0%Townhall: 5.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 5.5%Townhall: 13.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott McClallen: 3.8%Townhall: 5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

193 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker47%attributed speech102writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 20 words • 100.0% coverageMike Johnson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Johnson

73%flagged-word coverage
91 attributed words100% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+22.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Johnson: 22.0%22.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Mike Johnson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.