Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation Bill results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,770 hits . Analysis detected 9,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,352 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,265 of 37,536 keywords). This Reconciliation Bill is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Reconciliation Bill
Keyword details
Total words: 10,352
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst