Topic summary
45% 20 analyzed articles/videos 9,671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Engagement results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 4,021 hits . Analysis detected 40,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,822 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,794 of 15,753 topics). This Community Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Community Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 49,822
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score20 analyzed articles49.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst