Topic summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos6,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Kirk results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 3,012 hits. Analysis detected 30,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,515 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,381 of 15,766 topics). This Charlie Kirk is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Charlie Kirk
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate