Author summary
ā 0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Tamasco results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,179 hits . Analysis detected 20,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,348 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ā 83% (1,081 of 6,348 authors). This Marc Tamasco is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Marc Tamasco
Author details
Total words: 9,348
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.0% percentile 5.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.8% 12.8% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.4% 8.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.2% 23.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 13.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst