Topic summary
ā 87% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Red Sox results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,275 hits . Analysis detected 12,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,000 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (10,767 of 15,489 topics). This Boston Red Sox is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Boston Red Sox
Topic details
Total words: 13,000
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst