Red Sox-Orioles rained out, delaying Boston’s pursuit of record-tying 15-game win streak ⁠1%

By KEN POWTAK⁠4% Associated Press⁠60%

7/21/2026, 3:57:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 109 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (21,876 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the article peer group.

BOSTON (AP) — Tuesday’s game between the Orioles and Red Sox was postponed because of rain, delaying Boston’s pursuit of a franchise record-tying 15th straight victory. 
The teams will play a doubleheader Wednesday, with games scheduled for 1:35 p.m. and 7:10 p.m. 
EDT. 
Boston rallied for a 6-5 victory over Baltimore in the series opener on Monday night, its 14th consecutive victory. 
The longest winning streak in Red Sox history was a 15-game run in 1946. 
Rain started about three hours before the scheduled first pitch on Tuesday, and the game was called about 90 minutes later. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 1.6%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 3.3%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 1.1%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 2.2%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.7%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 11.6%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 1.8%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.3%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 2.7%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 2.2%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 2.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 1.0%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.3%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 2.3%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ken Powtak: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

109 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.