Author summary
4% 2 analyzed articles/videos 510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Powtak results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Self-Serving Bias , and Composition/Division , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 178 hits . Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,530 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,968 of 6,244 authors). This Ken Powtak is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Ken Powtak
Author details
Total words: 1,530
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.6% 11.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst