Keyword summary
70% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Red Sox results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,023 hits . Analysis detected 9,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,592 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,964 of 35,224 keywords). This Boston Red Sox is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Boston Red Sox
Keyword details
Total words: 10,592
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst