Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Trevor Hass results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 3,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Trevor Hass is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Trevor Hass
Author details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.4% 26.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.6% 8.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.9% 11.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst