Topic summary
40% 12 analyzed articles/videos 13,702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biology results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 3,892 hits . Analysis detected 43,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,873 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,831 of 16,442 topics). This Biology is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Biology
Topic details
Total words: 57,873
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles57.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst