Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Norman Bermudez results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,384 hits . Analysis detected 6,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,907 of 6,628 authors). This Ana Norman Bermudez is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Ana Norman Bermudez
Author details
Total words: 8,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.4% 15.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst