Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Anne Brown results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 961 hits. Analysis detected 6,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,532 of 6,628 authors). This Elizabeth Anne Brown is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Anne Brown
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
47%Elizabeth Anne Brown (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,572
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos