Topic summary
58% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Safety results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 9,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,707 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,643 of 15,753 topics). This Automotive Safety is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Automotive Safety
Topic details
Total words: 9,707
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst