Topic summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 13,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asia results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 6,868 hits . Analysis detected 49,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,883 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,245 of 15,142 topics). This Asia is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Asia
Topic details
Total words: 48,883
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles48.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst