Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Se Eun Gong results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 947 hits . Analysis detected 4,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (652 of 6,171 authors). This Se Eun Gong is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Se Eun Gong
Author details
Total words: 2,210
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.4% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 42.9% 42.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 20.2% 20.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.1% 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 42.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 20.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Special Pleading: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst