Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Se Eun Gong results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 4,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (652 of 6,171 authors). This Se Eun Gong is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Se Eun Gong
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Se Eun Gong (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,210
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.4% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 42.9%42.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 20.2%20.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 9.1%9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.0%9.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 42.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 20.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos