Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aniruddha Ghosal results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Pessimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 1,413 hits . Analysis detected 8,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of â 88% (785 of 6,170 authors). This Aniruddha Ghosal is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Aniruddha Ghosal
Author details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 27.2% 27.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.9% 13.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 17.1% 17.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Availability Heuristic: Author 27.2%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Author 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst