Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aniruddha Ghosal results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 1,413 hits. Analysis detected 8,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (785 of 6,170 authors). This Aniruddha Ghosal is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Aniruddha Ghosal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠88%Aniruddha Ghosal (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 27.2%27.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.9%13.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Author 27.2%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Author 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos