Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Bartlett results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 838 hits . Analysis detected 6,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,095 of 6,170 authors). This Kate Bartlett is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Kate Bartlett
Author details
Total words: 5,158
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.3% 16.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst