Topic summary
54% 16 analyzed articles/videos 8,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Safety results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 4,811 hits . Analysis detected 44,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,103 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,277 of 15,781 topics). This Ai Safety is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Ai Safety
Topic details
Total words: 48,103
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles48.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst