Topic summary
77% 23 analyzed articles/videos 12,679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Regulation results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 8,187 hits . Analysis detected 79,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 74,003 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,392 of 15,988 topics). This Ai Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Ai Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 74,003
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score23 analyzed articles74K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst