Topic summary
65% 36 analyzed articles/videos 20,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agriculture results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 8,776 hits . Analysis detected 86,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 133,537 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (16,115 of 16,562 topics). This Agriculture is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Agriculture
Topic details
Total words: 133,537
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score36 analyzed articles133.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst