Author summary
52%2 analyzed articles/videos691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jayme Lozano Carver results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,073 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,291 of 6,628 authors). This Jayme Lozano Carver is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Jayme Lozano Carver
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Jayme Lozano Carver (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,073
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos