Texas Panhandle shaken by strongest earthquake to hit the region 25%

By Jayme Lozano Carver52%

7/23/2026, 12:21:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 413 faulty-reasoning hits from 273 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.4% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,469 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the article peer group.

LUBBOCK  A 5.0 magnitude earthquake rocked the Texas Panhandle early Thursday morning, one of the strongest recorded in Texas. 
Effects from the earthquake were felt throughout the rural region and as far as southern Oklahoma and New Mexico. 
According to the U.S. 
Geological Survey, the earthquake occurred at 5:21 a.m. nearly 24 miles south-southeast of Spearman near the top of the Texas-Oklahoma border. 
On social media, Spearman residents said the earthquake shook homes. 
Some in Oklahoma City, nearly 250 miles away, reported feeling the effects of the earthquake. 
No structural damage or injuries have been reported so far. 
The USGS expects economic losses to be minimal. 
A.J. 
Harrel, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Amarillo, said the earthquake originated from northwest Roberts County, nearly 50 miles south of Spearman. 
Harrel said Thursday’s earthquake was stronger than what they typically see in the region. 
“We’ve had smaller earthquakes within the past year or two,” Harrel said. 
“They do happen here, just not frequently.” 
In the last five years, Texas has experienced seven earthquakes that measured at a 5.0 magnitude or higher. 
According to Earthquake Track, the earthquake in Spearman is tied for the sixth-biggest in Texas history. 
Last year, two of the largest earthquakes in state history struck in West Texas. 
Earthquakes in that region have been attributed to an increase in hydraulic fracking in the area. 
It is unclear what caused the earthquake in the Panhandle. 
“There are some minor fault lines in the Texas Panhandle that could cause weak to moderate earthquakes,” Harrel said. 
“They’re just not very frequent.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.9%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.2%The Texas Tribune: 2.6%Confirmation Bias5.9%This article: 7.7%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Anchoring Bias7.7%This article: 12.8%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.7%The Texas Tribune: 2.9%Availability Heuristic12.8%This article: 5.1%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.7%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.5%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.7%The Texas Tribune: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Jayme Lozano Carver: 5.0%The Texas Tribune: 4.9%Framing Effect13.2%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 5.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.9%The Texas Tribune: 1.8%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.9%The Texas Tribune: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Jayme Lozano Carver: 4.2%The Texas Tribune: 7.7%Negativity Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.0%The Texas Tribune: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error7.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.3%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Halo Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 6.6%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.9%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.9%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 8.2%The Texas Tribune: 3.4%Appeal to Authority26.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.7%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Jayme Lozano Carver: 3.9%The Texas Tribune: 2.8%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 5.3%The Texas Tribune: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.9%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.0%The Texas Tribune: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.2%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.7%Anecdotal9.2%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.9%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 2.3%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 1.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jayme Lozano Carver: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

273 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker30%attributed speech192writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 24 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 12 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageA.J. Harrel • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

A.J. Harrel

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.