Keyword summary
⁠13%4 analyzed articles/videos4,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lubbock results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,855 hits. Analysis detected 9,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,041 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (29,227 of 35,868 keywords). This Lubbock is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Lubbock
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠19%Lubbock (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos