Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These A.J. Harrel results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,200 of 28,364 speakers). This A.J. Harrel is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.
A.J. Harrel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 122
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.2% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos122 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos