Speaker summary
54% 15 analyzed articles/videos 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xavier Becerra results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 421.841 hits . Analysis detected 1,747.456 faulty-reasoning hits from 842 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,630 of 28,364 speakers). This Xavier Becerra is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Xavier Becerra
Speaker details
Total words: 842
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score15 analyzed videos842 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 41.9% 41.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst