Speaker summary
⁠44%5 analyzed articles/videos58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WHO results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,694 of 28,364 speakers). This WHO is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
WHO
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos