Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Anna Loren results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 885 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Anna Loren is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Anna Loren
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Anna Loren (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.5%2.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos