Speaker summary
â 67% 6 analyzed articles/videos 256.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Domestic Policy Council results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 1,444.155 faulty-reasoning hits from 256.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.2% and a BS Rank of â 38% (17,744 of 28,364 speakers). This White House Domestic Policy Council is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. White House Domestic Policy Council
Speaker details
Total words: 256.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 23.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos256.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 47.3% 47.3% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 32.8% 32.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 32.7% 32.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 28.5% 28.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 31.6% 31.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 47.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst