Author summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos3,501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Rampell results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 3,402 hits. Analysis detected 12,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,354 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (3,914 of 6,228 authors). This Catherine Rampell is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Catherine Rampell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠38%Catherine Rampell (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,354
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.5%27.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos