Author summary
â 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Phelan results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,806 hits . Analysis detected 15,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of â 73% (1,841 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Phelan is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Andrew Phelan
Author details
Total words: 9,560
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.9% 13.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst