BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,539 of 21,174 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the article peer group.

Smithsonian’s First Black Chief Pushes Back on Everything Trump Said 
Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch responded to President Trump’s most recent attack, framing the White House’s hostile 162-page July 4 report as a gross misrepresentation of what the storied cultural institution actually does. 
“While there will always be room for improvement, this report is not a fair characterization of the work and totality of the National Museum of American History,” Bunch said in an internal letter obtained by ABC News . 
“At the Smithsonian, our work is driven by scholarship, accuracy, and an uncompromising commitment to tell the fullness of America’s story. 
 As public servants and the keepers of this institution, we are charged with helping a nation find understanding, hope, and clarity and as part of that duty, we are dedicated to excellence, reflection, and growth.” 
The White House’s Domestic Policy Council essentially called the Smithsonian an extremist, anti-white, anti-American organization, writing that the museum “has become subject to institutional capture by a radical, activist ideology that is fundamentally opposed to telling the noble, honest story of the great country we know and love.” 
“As it stands today, it would benefit most Americans, especially parents bringing their children for a tour, if the Smithsonian’s flagship history museum had a label at every entrance that reads: ‘Warning: the exhibits in this museum were prepared by people who don’t want you to love your country,’” the report concluded. 
Bunch, who is the Smithsonian’s first Black chief and whose time leading the institution may very well be limited, encouraged his staff to continue to use their work to “find understanding, hope, and clarity.” 
How much can you really love America if you’re not willing to see all sides of its history, from its most triumphant moments to its most abhorrent ones? 
Everything contained in the Smithsonian museums—from the National African American History and Culture Museum to the American Art Museum—is there because it had an outsize impact on American culture. 
It seems that the right just can’t handle hearing anything negative about this country at all, regardless of how truthful it is. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.6%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.5%Malcolm Ferguson: 11.7%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect22.5%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 50.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 17.7%newrepublic.com: 13.0%Negativity Bias50.6%This article: 25.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 33.9%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.2%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias33.9%This article: 19.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 27.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 5.2%newrepublic.com: 3.7%Ad Hominem27.8%This article: 13.3%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man13.3%This article: 16.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 7.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma7.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 23.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 6.7%newrepublic.com: 7.9%Hasty Generalization23.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 54.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 8.9%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion54.4%This article: 7.8%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question7.8%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 28.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)28.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy6.1%This article: 25.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote25.0%This article: 14.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection14.4%This article: 61.4%Malcolm Ferguson: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice61.4%This article: 13.6%Malcolm Ferguson: 2.4%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination13.6%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 10.3%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Malcolm Ferguson: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

360 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers49%attributed speech183writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageLonnie Bunch • 38 words • 100.0% coverageLonnie Bunch • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLonnie Bunch • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWhite House’s Domestic Policy Council • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageLonnie Bunch • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words27% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+43.7 ptsWriter: 56.3%White House’s Domestic Policy Council: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-28.4 ptsWriter: 28.4%White House’s Domestic Policy Council: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-28.4 ptsWriter: 28.4%White House’s Domestic Policy Council: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-15.3 ptsWriter: 15.3%White House’s Domestic Policy Council: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%White House’s Domestic Policy Council: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.