Speaker summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos383.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uwe Boll results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 222.592 hits. Analysis detected 1,598.897 faulty-reasoning hits from 383.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,863 of 28,364 speakers). This Uwe Boll is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Uwe Boll
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠20%Uwe Boll (selected)14%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 383.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.4% percentile
13.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos383.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 49.0%49.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.0%26.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 49.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate