BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 59% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 5,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,298 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,649 of 21,168 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the article peer group.

Director Uwe Boll just released a movie that is ticking off all the right people. 
Called *Citizen Vigilante*, it is an unapologetic rejection of globalism, mass migration, Islamic conquest, and “woke” leftism. 
The movie bashes politicians, judges, NGOs, and law enforcement agencies that have bent over backwards to excuse *inexcusable* *crimes* committed by non-Western immigrants. 
It unequivocally demands a return to law and order. 
It urges viewers to seek justice. 
It threatens the continuing survival of any Western government that continues to allow outsiders to prey on its nation’s citizens. 
Boll’s movie is nothing less than a call for Westerners to revolt against the authorities who have refused to keep them safe. 
The opening title cards warn Western governments: “All behavior can be traced back to instincts. 
When justice is denied, instincts turn to vengeance.” 
Think: the British government’s decades-long cover-up of Muslim rape gangs...or the French and Canadian governments’ cover-up of church arson and attacks on Christians...or the German government’s efforts to censor news stories of Muslim immigrants raping children at public pools and shoving young women onto train tracks. 
Boll isn’t messing around. 
He’s telling Western governments in the clearest terms: Your deliberate choice to sacrifice your citizens to raping, murdering outsiders is about to unleash the primal instincts of millions of Americans and Europeans who refuse to remain victims. 
In other words, *vengeance* *is* *coming*. 
Just in case his message was not sufficiently clear, Boll leaves the audience with these words before the end credits: “This film is dedicated to the thousands of rape and murder victims in Europe who were betrayed by our legal system.” 
Without antiseptic apology, moral dithering, misplaced empathy, or two-faced whataboutism, Boll indicts Western “elites” for their many crimes against “the people” and suggests...*nay, encourages*...citizens to redress their grievances by seeking justice against the very public officials who have abused them for so long. 
In between the opening and ending cards that acknowledge Western citizens as real victims of their respective governments, there is a vigilante tale about an American taking out the trash in Europe. 
Why an American? 
Maybe because President Trump is the only Western leader actually taking the threat of mass invasion seriously. 
For what it’s worth, the vigilante’s only redeeming quality is that he recognizes European governments as monsters harming their citizens. 
He’s a psychopath, but that’s also part of Boll’s message. 
The director is telling viewers that they are behaving as “sheep” while their governments slaughter them. 
The American vigilante, incapable of being brainwashed by politicians’ “woke” sermonizing and virtue-signaling, is the only one acting rationally. 
He sees the whole European system as a threat to “the people” and decides to eliminate the threat. 
Where in Europe does the story take place? 
It doesn’t matter. 
Boll’s movie begins with a depiction of an all-too-common murder of a young mother randomly stabbed in the neck by a young punk. 
Boll then weaves in a number of tales of women who have been beaten, gang-raped, and left for dead. 
He spares us from having to watch most of the details. 
Instead, he shows us how these women have been broken and ignored by the government authorities entrusted to ensure their safety. 
In separate scenes, the American vigilante asks two young survivors if the police, prosecutors, and courts had given them “justice.” 
The broken look in their eyes answers the question definitively. 
Likewise, a resilient spirit washes over both of their faces once they learn that the vigilante has done what the authorities would never do: *execute real justice*. 
What does real justice mean? 
It means that Boll’s American vigilante doesn’t execute just the rapists and murderers. 
He also executes the families who support those rapists and murderers. 
“Are these the values you’re teaching your children?” 
he asks the father of a rapist. 
Because if the “values” from the Quran teach that “women in America and Europe deserve to be raped because of a dress code,” then “I don’t think it was the good ones that got out of your country. 
I think it was the bad ones.” 
Boll’s vigilante also executes the judges who allow those rapists and murderers to escape punishment by inexcusably painting the vile perpetrators as misunderstood “victims” of “traumatic integration.” 
“You really believe that?” 
the vigilante scoffs at a judge who found a way to blame Western culture and Western citizens for Islamic immigrants’ vile gang-raping of young girls. 
“You let a gang of rapists go. 
You know what that makes you? 
Just as bad as the perpetrators. 
Might as well have raped her yourself,” he says before slitting the judge’s wrists. 
Boll’s vigilante, in other words, executes judgment on *globalism*, itself, and all of globalism’s enablers who prey on Western citizens’ empathy and slander anyone who objects to the mass importation of foreign rapists and murderers by calling them “nationalists,” right-wingers,” “fascists,” or “racists.” 
Western society “is falling apart and dying,” the vigilante tells a judge. 
“And you are the cancer that is killing it.” 
This isn’t a Belgian, French, Spanish, Dutch, German, Swedish, or British story. 
It’s the story of Europe, generally  and an equally applicable warning to the governments of Canada, Australia, and the United States: Either end this foreign invasion, or you will be punished for your complicity. 
Aiding and abetting foreigners who commit horrific crimes will no longer be tolerated. 
Lest you think that I am exaggerating Boll’s bluntness, allow me to quote the American vigilante as he speaks directly to two separate audiences: (1) Western governments and (2) Western citizens. 
In one scene, he tells an Interpol chief (*i.e.*, one of globalism’s top cops): “The people will not accept a takeover... 
They never voted for what’s happening. 
This is an unfriendly takeover by the Islamist extremists and blindsided woke left. 
And if this takeover is successful, it’ll destroy the democracy you say you love. 
All the freedom, everything you enjoy and stand for. 
There’s only one option. 
You end this or *we the people* will end it ourselves.” 
The vigilante then tells the Interpol chief to “take this message” to his government leaders. 
Subtle? 
Hardly. 
The movie ends with an equally compelling video message from the vigilante to “the people.” 
This is what he says: “I’m here to help you take that control back. 
I’m here to show you that you’re no longer the victims. 
I’m here to show you that it’s time to go out and show these fuckers that they aren’t getting away with it anymore. 
Remember: I do this for you...until you learn to do it for yourselves.” 
*Holy moly*, no wonder this movie has been banned across Europe. 
In ninety minutes, it recognizes Europe’s rape and murder victims in a meaningful way; it excoriates third-world immigrants for having an “archaic value system” and a “commitment to religion over democracy and over anything else, including the rule of law”; and it warns Europe’s governing class that it will be overthrown and judged for crimes against humanity. 
Boll tosses explosive truth after explosive truth at the audience, and it is impossible not to see this movie as the beginning...*of something. 
* If European governments’ efforts to censor this movie and prevent citizens from receiving Boll’s message are any indication of how much they fear the public’s wrath, then it is clear that globalism’s “elites” are terrified of losing their heads one day soon. 
*Citizen Vigilante* isn’t just a movie. 
It’s a wakeup call for the ignorant, a call to arms for the fed-up, a promise to the victims, and an explicit warning to the West’s parasitic “elites.” 
The message for Western governments is simple: Change your policies immediately, or you will be judged ruthlessly. 
No justice? 
No peace. 
*Image: woodleywonderworks via <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/5319295174">Flickr</a>, <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode">CC BY 2.0</a>. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.5%J.B. Shurk: 3.8%American Thinker: 10.4%Confirmation Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%J.B. Shurk: 3.2%American Thinker: 3.7%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.4%American Thinker: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 1.5%American Thinker: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%J.B. Shurk: 1.4%American Thinker: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias5.5%This article: 13.0%J.B. Shurk: 8.8%American Thinker: 7.2%Framing Effect13.0%This article: 2.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%J.B. Shurk: 0.8%American Thinker: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.8%This article: 8.0%J.B. Shurk: 1.7%American Thinker: 2.6%Pessimism Bias8.0%This article: 59.0%J.B. Shurk: 9.0%American Thinker: 13.0%Negativity Bias59.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%J.B. Shurk: 2.5%American Thinker: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.8%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%J.B. Shurk: 8.0%American Thinker: 3.9%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 11.5%J.B. Shurk: 9.4%American Thinker: 5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias11.5%This article: 4.8%J.B. Shurk: 2.3%American Thinker: 2.7%Halo Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.1%American Thinker: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%J.B. Shurk: 0.8%American Thinker: 1.3%Recency Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%J.B. Shurk: 4.7%American Thinker: 5.7%Ad Hominem17.6%This article: 9.3%J.B. Shurk: 5.5%American Thinker: 4.1%Straw Man9.3%This article: 4.8%J.B. Shurk: 4.2%American Thinker: 4.7%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 11.9%J.B. Shurk: 5.5%American Thinker: 4.7%False Dilemma11.9%This article: 15.9%J.B. Shurk: 4.1%American Thinker: 3.3%Slippery Slope15.9%This article: 2.5%J.B. Shurk: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning2.5%This article: 25.7%J.B. Shurk: 13.4%American Thinker: 16.9%Hasty Generalization25.7%This article: 0.2%J.B. Shurk: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.6%Red Herring0.2%This article: 1.8%J.B. Shurk: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon1.8%This article: 44.1%J.B. Shurk: 19.6%American Thinker: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion44.1%This article: 6.0%J.B. Shurk: 1.8%American Thinker: 2.7%Begging the Question6.0%This article: 4.9%J.B. Shurk: 2.3%American Thinker: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.5%J.B. Shurk: 0.1%American Thinker: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.5%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 1.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.2%J.B. Shurk: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.6%Appeal to Nature1.2%This article: 0.9%J.B. Shurk: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.8%Composition/Division0.9%This article: 9.9%J.B. Shurk: 2.5%American Thinker: 3.6%Anecdotal9.9%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.6%J.B. Shurk: 1.9%American Thinker: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%J.B. Shurk: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.9%J.B. Shurk: 2.2%American Thinker: 3.1%Unattributed Quote13.9%This article: 8.2%J.B. Shurk: 1.8%American Thinker: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection8.2%This article: 40.1%J.B. Shurk: 13.5%American Thinker: 23.0%Biased Writer Voice40.1%This article: 33.3%J.B. Shurk: 14.8%American Thinker: 5.8%Indoctrination33.3%This article: 2.9%J.B. Shurk: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.9%This article: 28.7%J.B. Shurk: 15.1%American Thinker: 14.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias28.7%This article: 0.7%J.B. Shurk: 0.1%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.7%

1298 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.