Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vigilantism results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 1,591 hits. Analysis detected 14,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ā 86% (2,321 of 16,558 topics). This Vigilantism is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Vigilantism
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 86%Vigilantism (selected)8%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaningā€¦Sitewide 1.4%Topic 30.1%30.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 25.5%25.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 25.1%25.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.9%21.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.6%30.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos