Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J.B. Shurk results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 2,058 hits . Analysis detected 17,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,488 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,578 of 6,628 authors). This J.B. Shurk is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. J.B. Shurk
Author details
Total words: 10,488
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 14.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst