Keyword summary
ā 91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crimes Against Humanity results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 3,056 hits . Analysis detected 27,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,802 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (9,493 of 35,607 keywords). This Crimes Against Humanity is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Crimes Against Humanity
Keyword details
Total words: 13,802
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Politically Right Leaningā¦ Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst