Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ali Safavi results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 962 hits . Analysis detected 5,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Ali Safavi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ali Safavi
Author details
Total words: 3,018
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.9% 31.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.8% 13.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst