Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mohamed Alzanin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 7,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,387 authors). This Mohamed Alzanin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mohamed Alzanin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Mohamed Alzanin (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,172
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 19.5%19.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos