Speaker summary
43%8 analyzed articles/videos261.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UNESCO results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 118.796 hits. Analysis detected 260.81 faulty-reasoning hits from 261.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,152 of 28,364 speakers). This UNESCO is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.4% percentile
13.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos261.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate