Speaker summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Adams results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 144 hits . Analysis detected 713.574 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,147 of 28,364 speakers). This Tyler Adams is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Tyler Adams
Speaker details
Total words: 243
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 11.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos243 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 30.3% 30.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 36.6% 36.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 20.9% 20.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst