Speaker summary
50%4 analyzed articles/videos341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Chamberlain results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 549.192 faulty-reasoning hits from 341 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 10% (23,771 of 26,155 speakers). This Todd Chamberlain is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
9.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos341 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate