ICE Contractor Arrested For Shooting Protester ⁠35%

By Alex Nguyen⁠36%

7/17/2026, 9:07:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 566 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (13,411 of 20,472 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

An ICE detention center employee shot a woman on Thursday night after a protest outside an ICE facility in Aurora, Colorado, according to an Aurora Police Department statement released Friday afternoon. 
The center is operated by the private prison firm GEO Group, the largest recipient of private contracts with ICE to run immigration detention centers. 
A GEO Group employee, Brandon Booth, was arrested on suspicion of attempted second-degree murder and other charges. 
The woman, who investigators said was part of the protest, was injured and taken to the hospital but is expected to survive. 
Another woman who was with her was not hurt. 
According to the Aurora Police Department , Booth and other GEO Group staff were unable to enter the facility due to the protest. 
The two women argued with the employees and began walking away after taking photos of their cars. 
Booth then took out a personal firearm and fired one shot at the two women, hitting one of them in her lower body, before getting back into his car and driving away. 
NEWS RELEASE: A man has been arrested in connection with a shooting that left a woman injured Thursday night. 
Shortly before 7:30 p.m. on July 16, 2026, the Aurora Police Department responded to reports of a shooting in the 3100 block of N. 
Nome Street. 
Responding officers… pic.twitter.com/AqCgVsUpiV 
- Aurora Police Dept (@AuroraPD) July 17, 2026 
“We are aware that an off-duty Aurora ICE Processing Center employee was involved in a shooting incident,” a GEO Group spokesperson wrote in a statement . 
“This individual has been placed on unpaid administrative leave, and we will fully cooperate with law enforcement.” 
“We remain committed to ensuring an ethical, thorough, objective, and comprehensive review of this case,” Aurora Chief of Police Todd Chamberlain said . 
“Violence of any kind will not be tolerated in Aurora. 
Constitutional rights are a pivotal part of a just society—violence is not.” 
Allegations of violence against protesters have dogged GEO Group. 
An employee at Delaney Hall, an immigration detention center operated by GEO Group in Newark, New Jersey, allegedly struck a protester with his car last month. 
Court records show that the employee at the center of those allegations, Thomas K. 
Brown, claimed protesters caused him to drive his red Dodge Challenger into the woman who was struck by hitting the driver’s side of his car. 
Delaney Hall staff were also alleged to have beaten and punished detainees for speaking out and organizing to protest conditions within the facility. 
The employees, along with federal immigration agents, allegedly denied medical care, turned off ventilation, and deployed pepper spray. 
Advocates say conditions in the facility have not improved even after detainees held labor and hunger strikes and attention from media and lawmakers in June. 
Earlier this month, the Adams County Health Department said that GEO Group was preventing it from conducting a health investigation required by state law of the same ICE detention center in Aurora, after a possible spread of tuberculosis in the facility. 
On Tuesday, the Guardian reported that at least 12 detainees tested positive. 
One detainee told the paper that those impacted by the outbreak are being isolated in areas without air conditioning. 
On Tuesday, ICE denied any active tuberculosis cases, but the next day, officials said that one person who had tested positive was “treated, cleared, and removed from the country.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.8%Alex Nguyen: 3.2%Mother Jones: 4.1%Confirmation Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.1%Mother Jones: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Alex Nguyen: 3.1%Mother Jones: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 11.5%Alex Nguyen: 0.7%Mother Jones: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic11.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Alex Nguyen: 7.3%Mother Jones: 7.3%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.0%Mother Jones: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.4%Mother Jones: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 18.7%Alex Nguyen: 7.6%Mother Jones: 9.8%Negativity Bias18.7%This article: 3.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.7%Mother Jones: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.9%Mother Jones: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.4%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.5%Mother Jones: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Alex Nguyen: 2.0%Mother Jones: 1.6%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%Alex Nguyen: 1.5%Mother Jones: 1.1%Recency Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.8%Mother Jones: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.7%Alex Nguyen: 4.4%Mother Jones: 3.6%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.1%Mother Jones: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.8%Mother Jones: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Alex Nguyen: 3.3%Mother Jones: 4.8%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.6%Mother Jones: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Alex Nguyen: 7.7%Mother Jones: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.0%Alex Nguyen: 2.3%Mother Jones: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.6%Mother Jones: 2.4%Anecdotal11.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.4%Alex Nguyen: 1.5%Mother Jones: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.1%Middle Ground2.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.1%Mother Jones: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.5%Alex Nguyen: 2.2%Mother Jones: 1.8%Unattributed Quote17.5%This article: 5.1%Alex Nguyen: 1.6%Mother Jones: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection5.1%This article: 10.8%Alex Nguyen: 4.4%Mother Jones: 9.6%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 1.3%Mother Jones: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.6%Alex Nguyen: 1.9%Mother Jones: 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Nguyen: 0.4%Mother Jones: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

566 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers50%attributed speech285writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAurora Police Department • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAurora Police Department • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageAurora Police Department • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageAurora Police Dept • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGEO Group • 26 words • 100.0% coverageGEO Group • 17 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 23 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageThomas K. Brown • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageAdams County Health Department • 41 words • 0.0% coverageThe Guardian • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageICE • 29 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

ICE

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words10% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+96.8 ptsWriter: 3.2%ICE: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-15.4 ptsWriter: 15.4%ICE: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%ICE: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%ICE: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.